X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fe9fa,87053a579e787910
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe9fa,public
X-Google-Thread: 100b0c,87053a579e787910
X-Google-Attributes: gid100b0c,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,87053a579e787910
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f7a7,87053a579e787910
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f7a7,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-01 10:07:47 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!novia!novia!feed1.onemain.com!nntp2.onemain.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tindeus99@hotmail.com (Deus)
Newsgroups: 
 alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.romath,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: What is a Flonk??
Organization: atoms molecules biopolymers cells organisms biomes biosphere
 Usenet
Message-ID: <3b91154e.14179458@news.zoomnet.net>
References: <3B8AB3D6.2727@hotmail.com>
 <ipmloto37217aofe85ncenjabv6ejjcv7h@4ax.com> <3B8B911D.3C82@hotmail.com>
 <1kjnotonoc93vu3laecuqq9qotf8uht62k@4ax.com> <3B8D28EE.781E@hotmail.com>
 <06jqot4p0jodgf1jodosqph8g2np78gjfj@4ax.com> <3B8E9E74.4B00@hotmail.com>
 <hbjvot0d1p06ec1pocrh74d3oltvcf53r4@4ax.com> <3B8FD1F8.48F3@hotmail.com>
 <6jpvot46epaihoo59b9e5ql7roh3cubp66@4ax.com> <3B8FE9BE.7AD6@hotmail.com>
 <08rvotsa8fb9uoj9jp5pmp0udt9o72ld3r@4ax.com> <3B8FEEDE.297E@hotmail.com>
 <rgsvots5jkjshj1p5qqja1kfq28q28o9m3@4ax.com> <3B8FFA04.E2E@hotmail.com>
 <3b90d8b1.20779570@mel-news.tpg.com.au>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 52
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 17:11:02 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.32.48.226
X-Complaints-To: abuse@onemain.com
X-Trace: nntp2.onemain.com 999363802 208.32.48.226 (Sat,
 01 Sep 2001 13:03:22 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 13:03:22 EDT
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:81879
 alt.romath:26944 alt.usenet.kooks:126256 alt.ascii-art:7249

sdias@netlane.com (Shanaka Dias) wrote:
>On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 22:56:36 +0200, Veronica Karlsson
><ascii_girl@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>anonyme wrote:
>>> Veronica Karlsson wrote :
>>> >anonyme wrote:
>>> >> Veronica Karlsson wrote:
>>> >> >anonyme wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> You are quite the persuasive gurl aren't you? I tell you what. You
>>> >> >> start posting more to alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk and I will
>>> >> >> visit your chat.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >No. That group is much too busy for me. alt.romath is much nicer!
>>> >>
>>> >> Would you like more xposting then? <G>
>>> >
>>> >I rather like the current pace over here, but of course, if there are
>>> >some really good ones...
>>> 
>>> Ok. What would you define as a good one? Flaming or just general
>>> silliness?
>>
>>It depends...
>>
>>> >> But odd that you should ask what a Flonk is....
>>> >
>>> >Did I ask?
>>> >
>>> >*checks*
>>> >
>>> >Yeah, I guess I did. I'm not really curious to learn the answer.
>>> 
>>> Sorry, *I* am. =)
>>
>>Actually, I have heard this question somewhere before, and seen the
>>answer.
>>
>>*goes dejahunting*
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7vh1nb%24ra7%242%40nntpd.databasix.com&output=gplain

This definition is controversial, since it smacks of the analytic
rather than the synthetic, the syncretic and the eclectic.

Analysis is discouraged unless everyone's too discouraged to
discourage it.  Or it's funny.  Or irritating.

Signed,

God