X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,78f63be2b6ca0398 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-28 05:26:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjcppf01.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!nntpserver.com!hub1.nntpserver.com!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: "lastfuture (Peter Marquardt)" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Two dogberts Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:24:40 +0200 Organization: T-Online Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <3BB46656.2762@hotmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1001679803 06 25536 KTyMSZlGSZalHd 010928 12:23:23 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 520084321266-0001@t-dialin.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.6/32.525 Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:8090 On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:00:22 +0200, Veronica Karlsson wrote: >Robert Bowmaker wrote: >> >> Which is better in your opinion?: > >They look the same to me... > >No, wait! > >Here's one line from both: > >> _pod** $ $$$$$$o $ $ \\ > >> _pod** ,$ $$$$$$o ,$' $ \\ > > ^ ^ ^ > | | | > `--. .---------------'-' > V >There are some more "dots" on the second one. I didn't notice that at >first. I don't think it makes a big difference. Maybe you could use P >and d for the line where you use $ now? (to make the first picture >look a little less "pixellated") those "dots" look like the jave antialias to me :) nice work :) ..but basically marion is right.. try to use P d q b for the lines in the fist pic -- makes the lines less wide and still smooth