X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,7d94d29a9e8ea4e9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-13 14:07:36 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.64.68.27!newsgate.cistron.nl!amsnews01.chello.com!nlnews00.chello.com.POSTED!tanya. From: ppunk@damthatspam.chello.nl (Peter Punk) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Basement Studios fan art Organization: Total Disorganisation Message-ID: References: <9njiu7$7lqj7$1@ID-102694.news.dfncis.de> <3b9fe8b9$0$89073$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> <9nqpuf$99sl6$1@ID-102694.news.dfncis.de> <3ba0ffd7$0$89086$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.168.0.2 X-Original-Trace: 13 Sep 2001 23:07:57 +0200, 192.168.0.2 Lines: 33 X-Authenticated-User: donderfliegen Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:02:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.93.74.225 X-Complaints-To: abuse@chello.nl X-Trace: nlnews00.chello.com 1000414952 213.93.74.225 (Thu, 13 Sep 2001 20:02:32 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 20:02:32 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:7459 On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 20:50:36 +0200, "CeeJay" provoked the following text: >> > Be pleased with all of it .. It's FANTASTIC ! >> > I love seeing your work Joaquim .. more MORE !! >> >> Wow, thanks! :D > >And the humor .. I just read the "Why are you wearing my clothes" joke at >http://www.ite.mh.se/~joaal98/ascii/david_clothes.html > >I love it. >Alt.ascii-art is a very funny group .. and the people in it are funny people .. We even smell funny! >except Tran :) He doesn't smell like anything. (S)He used to smell like a troll but (s)he's a pice of a.a-a's funiture now. -- Peter Punk \ / ---\\\\--- / \ Op zoek gaan naar buitenaards leven? Kijk op http://home.hetnet.nl/~setiathomegroep/index.html voor tips, antwoorden, discussies. links, downloads en meer. 1583wu/2.297yrs Real computer scientists don't write code. They occasionally tinker with `programming systems', but those are so high level that they hardly count (and rarely count accurately; precision is for applications.)