X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,78f63be2b6ca0398 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-28 05:01:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.online.be!130.240.42.8.MISMATCH!luth.se!news.luth.se!news.luth.se!not-for-mail From: Veronica Karlsson Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Two dogberts Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:00:22 +0200 Organization: Ye 'Ol Disorganized NNTPCache groupie Lines: 36 Message-ID: <3BB46656.2762@hotmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.luth.se 1001678499 23628 130.240.16.109 (28 Sep 2001 12:01:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@luth.se X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) Cache-Post-Path: queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown@ny.sm.luth.se X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:8088 Robert Bowmaker wrote: > > Which is better in your opinion?: They look the same to me... No, wait! Here's one line from both: > _pod** $ $$$$$$o $ $ \\ > _pod** ,$ $$$$$$o ,$' $ \\ ^ ^ ^ | | | `--. .---------------'-' V There are some more "dots" on the second one. I didn't notice that at first. I don't think it makes a big difference. Maybe you could use P and d for the line where you use $ now? (to make the first picture look a little less "pixellated") -- (, http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/cgi/asciichat/ /|__--__ . __--__ |\ '__ /|\ _{ _ `.' / `.,_ _________ | _________ _,.' (/ `. / ||``._.' ASCII ART CHAT! `---'|:||,/ .' /| /|:| \ .' /\ \ __ __ _ `/|'\' ` `,/ /`,\ \ \ / /__ _ _ ___ _ _ (_)__ __ _ /,'\ \ .'.' /| \ V / -_) '_/ _ \ ' \| / _/ _` | |\ `.`. ,' / / | \_/\___|_| \___/_||_|_\__\__,_| | \ \ `, - `- -- `-'- -ejm-------------------------------------VK-- -`-' -- -' -