X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,b55a21879f8eebd4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-18 02:40:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!feed.news.nacamar.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!not-for-mail From: Markus Gebhard Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: JavE 2.0 - New Release! (Ascii-art freeware) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:41:13 +0200 Organization: University of Karlsruhe, Germany Lines: 22 Message-ID: <3BCEA3B9.41DA724E@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> References: <3BC97639.968303EA@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <3bc99a80.7953956@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <3BC9B8EE.4E8D4FD@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <1003395505.5359@itz.pp.sci.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: wn4-jarjar.wn4.uni-karlsruhe.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de 1003398026 4304 172.20.12.141 X-Complaints-To: usenet@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:8635 Ilmari Karonen wrote: > How about: > > f 2 > | x dx > J > > (F and J are probably the letters you want to use for the top and the > bottom of the integral sign respectively, but whether upper, lower or > mixed case looks best depends on the font.) I don't think it is a good idea to use letters for the integral symbol. It could be mixed up with upper/lower bounds for the integral. Consider an Integral over a set J. Even this simple example does not really look good in my eyes: b f 2 | x dx J a Markus