X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,12b49a8f35c1747 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-21 17:00:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!nntpserver.com!hub1.nntpserver.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!sjcppf01.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!easynews!sjc-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!stl-feed.news.verio.net!newsreader.wustl.edu!news.fas.harvard.edu!not-for-mail From: uncle monty Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: need care bear art Date: 21 Oct 2001 23:46:24 GMT Organization: aerowalk Lines: 34 Message-ID: <9qvmog$o3k$2@news.fas.harvard.edu> References: <9qv4kp$mhl$1@news.fas.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: is03.fas.harvard.edu Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:8824 drsquare wrote: : On 21 Oct 2001 18:37:13 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, : (uncle monty ) wrote: :>Robert Bowmaker wrote: :>:> hey if anyone cna help me i need care bear art! :>:> l8tz :>:> josh :> :>: Wouldn't it be quicker to type normal english? I mean, a few extra letters :>: instead of thinking up a shortened version of a word??? :> :>: What a care bear? :> :>: -- Robert :> :>I love when the goddamn moron grammar/spelling police get on-line to complain :>about someone else and make their own mistakes. Hey, Robert in New Zealand, :>didn't you know "English" has a capital E (if you're using capitals, which :>you were). The part of your post between the first question mark and the group :>of three question marks is not even remotely close to a sentence, let alone :>a question --and why use three question marks anyway, do you think that's :>correct? Your last line makes no sense at all, either. I presume you meant :>"What's a care bear?" So, my response to you is: : He wasn't complaining about spelling or grammar, he was talking about : deliberately shortening a word. Nice of you to take his post completely out : of context, but then again what do you expect from such a complete fuckup : as "uncle monty"? Oh dear, do we need to teach drsquare what "context" means? How on earth did I take Robert Bowman's post "out of context" when his post, plus the post he was responding to (the only post in the thread up to that point), was included in my response? What more context should I have included?