X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,132b80dc5b364196 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-19 09:51:18 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor-online.net!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail From: "CeeJay" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art References: <3bf4d925@runswick.octacon.co.uk> <362bvtsnhmkhptfem5fisndj3nuba42p4n@4ax.com> <7h=5Owym=ZeoszU2OoAAlWMfXSxK@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Dana Sculley Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:51:56 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Lines: 9 Message-ID: <3bf94695$0$25392$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> Organization: TDC Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.62.219.116 X-Trace: 1006192277 dread05.news.tele.dk 25392 80.62.219.116 X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:11036 > > I think that while we can more easily make out where the > >curves of Gillian's face are, putting so much white/10% shading right > >beside her makes everything else seem too dark. > > Is it art yet? Not yet IMO , if it was cleaned up and the lines were outlines .. then maybe