X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,343109208f5abf22 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-21 10:48:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!lt134.ben.tuwien.ac.AT!not-for-mail From: Gerfried Fuchs Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Any regular Regulars? Date: 21 Nov 2001 18:48:17 GMT Organization: FAQ-Team for at.linux Lines: 29 Message-ID: <2001-11-21_19.43.44@alfie.ist.org> References: <3bfa805e$0$367$9b622d9e@news.freenet.de> <3bfa8385.1279389@news.concentric.net> <3bfa91a4$0$164$9b622d9e@news.freenet.de> <1hrlvt8fl337665423lgdfq4e73vaiffmd@4ax.com> <3bfafe39.32695457@news.concentric.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lt134.ben.tuwien.ac.at (193.170.74.134) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1006368497 2699214 193.170.74.134 (16 [49556]) Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Editor: Vi Improved X-Signature-Color: cyan X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.8.2 (Perl) Comments: This is my personal opinion... User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:11275 * MJP [2001-11-21 02:09]: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:07:49 +0000, drsquare wrote: >>They're not regulars, they're has-beens. drsquare and his amazing flatfish >>related ascii-art is the new regular. > > your frequent posts attacking other people hardly qualifies you as a regular, > except as a regular ass, in that you seem over qualified. I wouldn't word it that hard, but yes ;) And, what even weights harder to me, I can't remember any ascii's from drsquare - which of course should be much more important than starting regular rants about anything. obASCII: /\ /\ / \/\/ \ / \ \ \ recognizeable as pyramids? / \ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ So long! Alfie -- Ctrl+Option+Command + P + R dracus - YE GODS! That's worse than EMACS! hehehehe don't ask what that does :P