X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,7f5aceb0d0bd9864
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,36007fb8a27ab4b7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b427,932853b66dabc4e7
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b427,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-28 06:33:39 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.213.112.26!newsfeed1.ulv.nextra.no!nextra.com!uio.no!nntp.uib.no!not-for-mail
From: Ketil Z Malde <ketil@apal.ii.uib.no>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.destroy.microsoft
Subject: Re: Hand Mafe vs Algorithmic Conversions
Date: 28 Nov 2001 15:33:37 +0100
Organization: University of Bergen
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <egoflnynge.fsf@apal.ii.uib.no>
References: <pl5nvtgmq40drdq4rr2tmpla6j8bpqov5a@4ax.com>
 <slrn9vnk7d.41c.ewill@lexideb.athghost7038suus.net>
 <3bfbf3e6$0$219$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk>
 <3BFBFA67.C67247B3@cumulus.com>
 <3bfd819f$0$25359$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk>
 <3BFEEF64.FF962128@cumulus.com> <3C00EF28.6091C374@hotmail.com>
 <7v420ug21f7pijpp89iubti6dd5403m1vv@4ax.com> <3C015C0A.39DF2492@hotmail.com>
 <uls20u4d02j2psuf7rqq2dn4qvbr0i1j56@4ax.com> <3C0274F1.5F03705@hotmail.com>
 <3tg60ugu999t1jf5iblbt0u73ekfkerk76@4ax.com> <3C03C082.22D90F75@hotmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: apal.ii.uib.no
X-Trace: toralf.uib.no 1006958018 50444 129.177.16.7 (28 Nov 2001 14:33:38
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@uib.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Nov 2001 14:33:38 GMT
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:11872 comp.os.linux.advocacy:148931
 alt.destroy.microsoft:22837

Veronica Karlsson <ascii_girl@hotmail.com> writes:

> There's more than one way to "reduce a sig". You can reduce the size,
> or you can simply use it less often. 

Hey!

I've used a one-line sig for about six zillion posts.  Does that mean
I now have credit to once post an eighteen-zillion-line sig?


>>        _oo-.=.
>>       '^^/_ `-.
>>       `""-'`_  `-_.-
>>        _o/,-'(('""

> I asked somebody who didn't know what that's supposed to be and
> his guess was: "a bird sitting on a branch or maybe a squirrel
> on a motorcycle".   :-)

Well, no big wonder, I'd say, you got Melbourne placed in the wrong
spot. 

-kzm
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants