X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,132b80dc5b364196 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-24 16:05:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail From: "CeeJay" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art References: <3bf4d925@runswick.octacon.co.uk> <362bvtsnhmkhptfem5fisndj3nuba42p4n@4ax.com> <9t5n09$m1q1@OM9.omantel.net.om> <3C0027C8.7642C9C0@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Dana Sculley Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 01:05:59 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Lines: 46 Message-ID: <3c0035b6$0$74692$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> Organization: TDC Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.62.219.116 X-Trace: 1006646711 dread03.news.tele.dk 74692 80.62.219.116 X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:11583 "Veronica Karlsson" wrote in message news:3C0027C8.7642C9C0@hotmail.com... > Taliszanna wrote: > > > > OBASCII: http://www.stud.uni-hannover.de/~freise/ascii/mno/nude_men.txt > > > > ../MMMMMMM\ > > ./MMMMMMMMMMMMM\ > > /MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM\ > > /MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM\ > > /MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM\ > > |MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM > > |MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM > > |MMM/.......\MMMMMMMMMM| > > \ ".........\MMMMMMM-"| > > ) ".. ___.. \MM/..|| > > . _./|||| \\.I.|:\ > > \||||HHH:::`.....(::..\ > > `||HH:::::............\ > > ||:.:::::: .......|...\ > > ||') .::::..............:\_____ > > \` ::)..... /|. |...... ` __ > > //::::::. /:||\:........-.......:::|\ > > \ \::: /::|::|:::/............ ...:|\ > > /-----:::|...:|\|............. ..:| > > > > * Isn't the whole idea of "obascii" to post something _new_ > and _original_? I have pointed that out to her before ( I don't think she saw it because it was not replied to ) .. finished archived pictures can't really be diddled which is one of the best things about a obascii .. the life it can take on by it's own .. with new people rediddling in it each post. > * www.chris.com and Andreas' site are collections. There's no > point in quoting those sites as "sources" (unless of course > you're posting one of Andreas' pictures...). I would agree with that. It should be enough to keep the signature