X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,36007fb8a27ab4b7 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,7f5aceb0d0bd9864 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-26 23:35:24 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!netnews.com!xfer02.netnews.com!news.voicenet.com!news3.voicenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: T. Max Devlin Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Hand Mafe vs Algorithmic Conversions Organization: the 'net Reply-To: tmax@voicenet.com Message-ID: References: <3BFBFA67.C67247B3@cumulus.com> <3bfd819f$0$25359$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> <3BFEEF64.FF962128@cumulus.com> <3C00EF28.6091C374@hotmail.com> <7v420ug21f7pijpp89iubti6dd5403m1vv@4ax.com> <3C015C0A.39DF2492@hotmail.com> <9ttkir$n22$1@kujawiak.man.lodz.pl> <3C02A172.23D149EB@cumulus.com> <3c02b28a$0$74741$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 38 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 07:35:21 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.71.89.55 X-Complaints-To: abuse@voicenet.com X-Trace: news3.voicenet.com 1006846521 209.71.89.55 (Tue, 27 Nov 2001 02:35:21 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 02:35:21 EST Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:11783 comp.os.linux.advocacy:148188 Strolling through comp.os.linux.advocacy, I heard drsquare say: >On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:23:10 +0100, in alt.ascii-art, > ("CeeJay" ) wrote: > >>> > 1 _oo-.=. >>> > 2 '^^/_ `-. >>> > 3 `""-'`_ `-_.- >>> > 4 _o/,-'(('"" >>> > >>> > brojek. >>> >>> You guys are gooooddd! >> >>I have been trying for the last hour to do a four line T-rex with a ponytail , >>glasses and goatee , stomping a wintroll.. >> >>It's HARD .. it's VERY hard! >>Considering that then brojeks try is very good .. only problem is it's soo >>compact that in order to see what it is you have to KNOW what it should be >>before viewing it ! >> >>A potential problem .. especially with a signature. >> >>Maybe it would be easier if we tried to do a dino gnarling at a windows logo - >>the windows logo can be done in 4 lines and not having to do all thoose details >>frees you up to do a much nicer dino. > >I don't think gnarling. Laughing would be better. Yes, but then we'd have to spend months on flamewars over 'bwah-ha' or 'guffaw'. This'll work. Thanks for your time. Hope it helps. -- _oo-.=. '^^/_ `-. `""-'`_ `-_.- _o/,-'(('""