X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,65f6e9a9181678d0 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-15 21:09:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!torn!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!tribune.usask.ca!chem4823.usask.ca!taliszanna From: Taliszanna Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Conversions : Art or not ? Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 23:09:23 -0600 Organization: University of Saskatchewan Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <9sjb2j.b0.1@Lucida.Console.Fans.International.Organization> <3BF04C4C.D72372E0@xs4all.nl> <3bf242a9$0$767$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: chem4823.usask.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: tribune.usask.ca 1005887357 4579 128.233.48.23 (16 Nov 2001 05:09:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@tribune.usask.ca NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Nov 2001 05:09:17 GMT In-Reply-To: Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:10526 On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, drsquare wrote: > No it's not. Would you consider Leonardo da Vinci good at painting if he > just scanned in his pictures and touched them up a bit? No, would you fuck. > ----[brevity snip]---- > What would you say if you discovered the Mona Lisa was just made by > paint-by-numbers? Would you still consider the bloke you painted it a great > artist? > You are saying that you believe ascii-art to be comparable to the Mona Lisa and da Vinci's work? If that is the case, I find it hilarious. TAL