X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,ced2b975ce40b48d X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-29 13:39:57 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!213.204.128.162!news000.worldonline.se!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!amsnews01.chello.com!nlnews00.chello.com.POSTED!tanya. From: ppunk@damthatspam.chello.nl (Donderfliegen) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: (GothiKinky ASCII) A Betty Paige Wannabe Organization: Total Disorganisation Message-ID: <0oad0u4quaacr9lqs344j8fjhol8p58pp4@4ax.com> References: <7vh0vt8phnvmglfdfddkvv571i7d6ivud9@4ax.com> <3BFF88B1.4E6A0448@hotmail.com> <2001-11-29_15.05.52@alfie.ist.org> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.168.0.69 X-Original-Trace: 29 Nov 2001 22:39:48 +0100, 192.168.0.69 Lines: 62 X-Authenticated-User: donderfliegen Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:33:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.93.74.225 X-Complaints-To: abuse@chello.nl X-Trace: nlnews00.chello.com 1007069612 213.93.74.225 (Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:33:32 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:33:32 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:11937 On 29 Nov 2001 14:31:31 GMT, Gerfried Fuchs provoked the following text: >> I know, i do have Lynx (Win32 version, v2.8.4dev.16), that's how i >> checked for Lynx compatibility. Besides, i was talking about the lack >> of frames support in my copy of Lynx, perhaps that's different in more >> recent versions, i don't know. > > Lynx *does* support frames. Didn't you notice? It shows you the links >to the different parts of the frame. > > FRAME: top > FRAME: main > FRAME: bottom > >.. *is* frame support. lynx simply don't render frames. That doesn't >mean it isn't able to recognize them. And to be honest, I guess it >never will. Dang, i never noticed but now that you mention it i see it. But what i meant was to actually render the frames as you said. I didn't mean it as a form of critisism, but more as a fact. > If you are looking for a textmode browser that renders frames then give >w3m a try -- it's also available in a win32 version. I am not, but thanks for thinking with me. I am not looking for a textmode browser, i _was_ at one point looking for a browser as basic as possible and i think Lynx is as basic as it gets. I only used it to test my website. >> Why don't you take a look and see how i have optimised my backgrounds? >> The URL is http://home.hetnet.nl/~setiathomegroep/ > > You can take a snapshot of how w3m would display it at > ... Or.... You could take a look for yourself instead of suggesting links. >*hmm* Seems to be down currently (the >text-script, not the page itself). Maybe you have better luck. But you >can at least look at some screen-shots at that page, too. Looks nice, and i hope many peole will use it, but i don't think i will. >Alfie >P.S.: Please keep even your text-lines to about 74 characters or so at a >maximum, it makes them better to read - there are people that use only >80 character wide displays. Ermmm... Context? Did you mean my website or my posts? -- Peter Punk \ / ---\\\\--- / \ Castrate my email adress to reply. Sharks are as tough as those football fans who take their shirts off during games in Chicago in January, only more intelligent. -- Dave Barry, "Sex and the Single Amoeba: What Every Teen Should Know"