X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,7f5aceb0d0bd9864 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,36007fb8a27ab4b7 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-30 01:35:09 PST From: Mel Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Hand Mafe vs Algorithmic Conversions Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:34:21 +0200 Organization: www.AdderleyStreet.co.za Message-ID: <2vde0ucq8cskondt1aprarn0gi88ad1js0@4ax.com> References: <7v420ug21f7pijpp89iubti6dd5403m1vv@4ax.com> <3C015C0A.39DF2492@hotmail.com> <9ttkir$n22$1@kujawiak.man.lodz.pl> <3C02A172.23D149EB@cumulus.com> <3c02b28a$0$74741$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> <7f5d0ugptm63eqgnsoi6fpokuelp0lmjua@4ax.com> <3c06dec4.37366408@news.concentric.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: user14669.vip-za.com X-Trace: 30 Nov 2001 11:33:34 -0800, user14669.vip-za.com Lines: 44 X-Report: Report abuse to newsabuse@vip-za.com Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed.nyc.globix.net!infeed.is.co.za!feeder.is.co.za!newsfeed.vip-za.com!batman.vip-za.com!user14669.vip-za.com Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:11951 comp.os.linux.advocacy:149794 On 30 Nov 2001 01:20:40 GMT, mikechat.remove@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) sucked my dick and said: >On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:04:04 +0000, drsquare wrote: >>On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 07:35:21 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, >> (T. Max Devlin ) wrote: >>>Strolling through comp.os.linux.advocacy, I heard drsquare say: >>>>>A potential problem .. especially with a signature. >>>>>Maybe it would be easier if we tried to do a dino gnarling at a windows logo - >>>>>the windows logo can be done in 4 lines and not having to do all thoose details >>>>>frees you up to do a much nicer dino. >>>>I don't think gnarling. Laughing would be better. >>>Yes, but then we'd have to spend months on flamewars over 'bwah-ha' or >>>'guffaw'. This'll work. >>>Thanks for your time. Hope it helps. >>I think "guffaw" would be more characteristic. >you know T-Max, I thought you were kidding..... no one is laughing here... BWA... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! sorry... damn this 5 year old girl tastes good after 2 days... -- smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself if in doubt, suck me