X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,610d0466360c7d24
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-12 03:22:44 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.sj.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!212.74.64.35!colt.net!news.tele.dk!TDC-Europe.POSTED!ip92.hgnxr2.ras.tele.dk!not-for-mail
From: "Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen" <newsgroup@CeeJay.cjb.nOt>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: A bit of advice
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 00:38:47 -0700
Organization: Posted through some European Outpost of TDC Internet A/S
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <9dj2th$os6$1@news.inet.tele.dk>
References: <38lmft43av16t3g7n62623dke8i6n4v0gf@4ax.com>
 <3afbf3e7.715191@news.ntlworld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip92.hgnxr2.ras.tele.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.inet.tele.dk 989662961 25478 195.215.226.92
X-Complaints-To: the appropriate department of the poster's provider
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Xref: archiver1.sj.google.com alt.ascii-art:5654

> > Which one do you prefer? and any suggestion to improve?

> The first one uses non-ascii stuff () and IMHO the second one looks better
too

I like them both, and it really doesn't matter if the first uses extended ascii
since its for use on a webpage.
Sure it looks odd for some here but it will look fine on a webpage.

> and also more refreshing as you're making use of the H rather than just using
> 'standard' ascii art characters (not a v. good explanation, but still).

> However, I've never been to Qu[e with funny bit]bec - is there a picture we
can
> compare it to?

Yeah a link to a picture would give us an idea of if it's close to real life and
give hints on how to improve it