X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,408d6a125cb9ee63
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-28 02:42:07 PST
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!btnet-peer!btnet!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!server3.netnews.ja.net!bath.ac.uk!ab6rah
From: ab6rah@bath.ac.uk (R A Hart)
Subject: Re: Image to Ascii Competition (was: -Very Simple Java JPG to ASCII
  Converter)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1
Organization: School of Architecture and Civil Engineering,
 University of Bath, UK
Message-ID: <GAwKxA.IAM.D.ma@bath.ac.uk>
References: <3AC05289.614BF064@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
    <3AC1B30B.284F125E@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:24:46 GMT
Lines: 25
Xref: supernews.google.com alt.ascii-art:4961

In article <3AC1B30B.284F125E@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>,

>  - The 10 (?) images with the most votes are the candidates for the
> competition in stage 3. They will be explicitly made public on the

I'm not sure about just having a straight vote. I know it's probably
simplist, but I presume what we want is a reasonable cross-section of the
types of image, and size of output. Why not split the images up into a
number of categories, and vote for one for each. 

Maybe we should put each image in at 2 output sizes.

Rob

 http://www.bath.ac.uk  __/\__              Robert Hart
       /~ab6rah/        \    /           Ground Floor Flat
                  __/\__/    \__/\__   2 Alexander Buildings
                  \                /           Bath
                  /_              _\          BA1 6AT
                    \            /
      __/\__      __/            \__      __/\__
      \    /      \                /      \    /
__/\__/    \__/\__/                \__/\__/    \__/\__