X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,c8b65d22e2af41ee X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-23 04:11:25 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!a212596379.net-htp.DE!not-for-mail From: "Thomas Mertens" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Image2Ascii Competition update Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:09:53 +0200 Lines: 13 Message-ID: <9h1tgr$bb2o1$1@ID-43934.news.dfncis.de> References: <3B33257D.C78C9AA1@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <3b346498.1265390@news.ntlworld.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: a212596379.net-htp.de (212.59.63.79) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 993294683 11897601 212.59.63.79 (16 [43934]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:6362 "Stuart Moore" wrote: > I notice that for Thomas Mertens' Mona Lisa he says he changed the image a bit - > any chance we can see the changed version? Be interesting to do a direct > comparison of how some of the others deal with an optimised image - and very > well optimised, judging from the quality of the image No Problem, I can send the changed image to Markus. I made 2 different versions and decided which one locked better after converting into ascii, only difference was the degree of contrast. Thomas