X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,69af86368cd701e2
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-31 21:51:57 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!sjc-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!sjc-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mikechat@best.com (MJP)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Female comedic ascii art??
Message-ID: <3b171ea4.11431126@news.verio.net>
References: <IsjM6.102023$2_.34018841@news3.rdc1.on.home.com>
 <3b01ca32.20707006@news.verio.net> <3B0AC3FC.3E34@hotmail.com>
 <9f4066$o1j$1@uranium.btinternet.com> <3B16A99F.2651@hotmail.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 68
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 04:52:47 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.24.164.24
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net
X-Trace: sjc-read.news.verio.net 991371167 209.24.164.24 (Fri,
 01 Jun 2001 04:52:47 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 04:52:47 GMT
Organization: Verio
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:5925

On Thu, 31 May 2001 22:29:19 +0200, Veronica Karlsson <ascii_girl@hotmail.com> wrote:

 >Laury wrote:
 >> Veronica Karlsson wrote:
 >> | MJP wrote:
 >> | <snip>
 >> | > eh, is it an impressionistic rendition of the "Statue of David"?
 >> | >     .%%%%%.
 >> | >   .%%%%^%%%%.
 >> | >   '%%' ,.'%%'
 >> | >    ; o) o  ;@
 >> | >     - c - /|
 >> | >      \=-_/ |
 >> | > _____)    _|______
 >> | >                   \
 >> | >      \     /       \
 >> | >                (    )
 >> | > \  .        .  /(    )
 >> | > \ _    / \   _ / \   \
 >> | > \      / \     /  \   \
 >> | >
 >> | > oh well, anyway the statue was I heard the artist's version of "perfection"
 >> | >
 >> | >     ,%&%.
 >> | >     o((o
 >> | >       c
 >> | >
 >> | >  might be an overstatement of the statue's "attributes"
 >> |
 >> | That looks painful. Please, complete the picture.  :-)
 >> 
 >
 >You had a nice start there, why not finish it!
 >
 >> When I was doing nude male art,
 >
 >Yes...   :-)
 >
 >> it was suggested that the size
 >> should be about half the size you see. 
 >
 >?
 >
 >> Surprisingly, this works
 >> quite well, visually, although I used to think that it was to
 >> protect the male ego!
 >
 >Hmmm... what are we talking about here?
 >
 >> For those who think size is important, Build your perfect man
 >> around the example below.
 ><snip>
 >
 >Where is the rest of him?
 >
 >

who are ya talkin to?

-- 
+-----------------\----------------------------------------+
|\/ / \/ / \/ / \/ :                                       |
|_\/ \_\/ \_\/ \_\/|        I                              |
|  ___  ___  ___  _;          g      d->http://www.jave.de |
|\/ / \/ / \/ / \//           o     E                      |
\_\/ \_\/ \_\/ \,'             t JAV                       |
+'-.---------,-'------------------- -----------------------+
    '-------'