X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,46020ba0711fa1ec
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-02 04:18:06 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: jjs_ascii@yahoo.com (jjs)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: JavE animation
Date: 2 Dec 2001 04:18:06 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <3baa0398.0112020418.4db9d444@posting.google.com>
References: <3baa0398.0111291702.5202ba4e@posting.google.com>
 <3C07C846.91CAC51B@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.14.88.43
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1007295486 22537 127.0.0.1 (2 Dec 2001 12:18:06
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Dec 2001 12:18:06 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:12071

Markus Gebhard <ukgh@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote in message news:<3C07C846.91CAC51B@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>...
> jjs wrote:
> > 
> > I did an animation in JavE java of some lovely snow ballerinas.
> 
> Wow, it is great! It must have been a lot of work.
> BTW: it is very funny to turn the speed to "as fast as possible" :)
> 


funny, but can be nausiating


> > You may need to zoom out.
> > (Is there anyway to change the font for these?)
> 
> No, but maybe I will add an options for the font size in future.
> 
> > I'll try a javascript
> > version when the next JavE comes out.
> 
> It will still take a little time until the next release, for somebody
> has found a lot of work for me to do...
> But I have converted your jmov to JavaScript and uploaded it to my
> server:
>  http://www.jave.de/demo/JJS_ASCII_Snow_Dancers.html
> So you can try to adjust the font, etc. 


thanks, I put it on my site (it seems the server's prevention of
direct linking of most files was causing the java version errors). I'd
like to set the font face to Lucida Console. Couldn't figure out how
to change the font away from the browser default (with ie 6 or opera
5, the basefont= didn't effect it). But it's not that important.


>It also seems to me the
> JavaScript player has performance problems with animations of that
> size...
> 

it does seem slower on my 350 mhz machine

> Markus


jjs