X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,ced2b975ce40b48d X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-06 16:47:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!amsnews01.chello.com!nlnews00.chello.com.POSTED!tanya. From: ppunk@chello.balls.nl (Donderfliegen) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Tali's Moogies (was "(Gothic ASCII) - Neil Gaiman's "Death" #1") Organization: Total Disorganisation Message-ID: <1unv0u4ldvh0vd4deoba128gsvvb72vs2h@4ax.com> References: <3c0d2eb9.17084657@news.concentric.net> <3c0ec5b6.32362132@news.concentric.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.168.0.123 X-Original-Trace: 6 Dec 2001 22:28:27 +0100, 192.168.0.123 Lines: 64 X-Authenticated-User: donderfliegen Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 21:22:11 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.93.74.225 X-Complaints-To: abuse@chello.nl X-Trace: nlnews00.chello.com 1007673731 213.93.74.225 (Thu, 06 Dec 2001 20:22:11 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 20:22:11 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:12246 On 06 Dec 2001 01:33:37 GMT, mikechat.remove@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) provoked the following text: >>>so is a digibetic a person who pees their pants when attempting to use the >>>computer? >>LOL!!! >>It is actually a contraction of "digital analphabetic" >which took me a second to see that as an+alphabetic not anal+phabetic LOL!!! had the feeling you would after i typed it, so i left it the way it is :-) >but I like my definition better, and its almost as accurate as yours ;) >Digibetic: digitally illiterate, esp; One not familure with computers and > prone to spontaneous urination while attempting to use one. >hows that? };-) ROFL!!! We should start building a new dictionary :-)) >>>how about these >>>digirati: Those comfortable with, and knowledgable about computers. >>Sounds about right, doesn't it? That would make me a digiratus. > digitally valid? ^^^^^ No, if we are digirati(i), then i am a digiratus. Makes sense, doesn't it? (i don't know what's the opposite of "plural", so i've put it this way) >>>digiphobic: fear of digital devices >>My mom. >Mine is getting better, sends regular e-mails, and forwards things too! I am _so_ jealous! I wish i had a mom like that. >>>digitorium: Computer room? >>My living room. >(cough) mine too. I have 2 in my livingroom and 3 more (in working order) in various rooms around the house. I am not mentioning the ones that are busted or so old that i can't (or won't) use them. >>>how about >>>ASCIIidium: small ASCII picture, esp; small ObASCII >>>ASCIIorium? >>ASCIItorium: ASCII chatroom. >hmm Maybe VK will have to rename her webchat huh? > ___ ____ _____ ____ ____ __ _ > / _ | / __/ / ___/ / _/ / _/ / /_ ___ ____ (_) __ __ __ _ > / __ | _\ \ / /__ _/ / _/ / / __/ / _ \ / __/ / / / // / / ' \ > /_/ |_| /___/ \___/ /___/ /___/ \__/ \___/ /_/ /_/ \_,_/ /_/_/_/ > >has a nice ring to it anyway I don't know, people tend to grow quite attached to the name of something of their own. Even if it's a terrible name (like "Miditation", a former website of mine). -- __ ___ / ) _/_ _(_ /'_ _ _ /(_/()/)(/(-/ / (/(-(/(-/) _/ Castrate me to reply by e-mail Adultery or Fornication (living togeather while not married or having sex with someone that is not your spouse) results in a fine of $500 and/or 6 months in prison. (Mississippi state law -Sec. 97-29-1)