X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,3483bd10835621f X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-25 22:46:51 PST Path: newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!cleanfeed.casema.net!leda.casema.net!newsfeed1.news.nl.uu.net!sun4nl!reader1.news.nl.uu.net!not-for-mail From: mic@dataweb.BOUNCE_SPAM.nl (miK) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: [TaLk] Classic ascii pics Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 05:46:49 GMT Organization: UUNET-NL (http://www.nl.uu.net) Lines: 35 Message-ID: <3ae7a0e2.21937939@NEWS.DATAWEB.NL> References: <99l69i$ftc$1@news.ox.ac.uk> <3AC138FF.9F087CDC@gtcom.net> <3AE037A6.1788@hotmail.com> <9bpoi3$s8d$1@news.ox.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: noordeinde-59.denhaag.dataweb.nl X-Trace: porthos.nl.uu.net 988264007 23639 193.78.237.178 (26 Apr 2001 05:46:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@nl.uu.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Apr 2001 05:46:47 GMT X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235 Xref: newsfeed.google.com alt.ascii-art:5449 IInstead of removing ASCII-pics that aren't displayed as should on that BBC-website, you (not just Henry, but "you" as a group) could try to explain to these folks (webmasters etc.) how to display ASCII-art properly on a webpage. (guess: the
 tags aren't working, because
--thru CSS-- all chars are forced proportional)

(ASCII-art is not just the first pictorial form of art in the digital
era. It has proven to be an efficient, smart way to transport ideas,
when language fails. Compositions of ASCII-art transcend dry, serial,
procedural words and sentences and become rich, parallel, associative
images. And it's still 7 bit.


Henry Segerman wrote:

> Veronica Karlsson  wrote:
> : Krogg wrote:
> :> Henry Segerman wrote:
> :> >
> :> > I'm in the process of writing an entry on ascii art for h2g2 (The 'Earth
> :> > edition' of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
> :> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/h2g2/guide/ )
> :> > Suggestions please :)
> :> 
> :> I nominate VK's version of Esher's waterfall.
> 
> : I un-nominate VK's version of Esher's waterfall.
> 
> Ok, I've removed it from the article. Hmmm. Looks like they've changed 
> something on the site so that PRE tags aren't working...*sigh*
> 
> -- 
>  ,-.  Henry Segerman
>          uewJa6aS hJuaH  `-'