X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,152b5f437458a78a X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: "Tom R. Earlywine" Subject: Re: file size (was: ascii art for email ...) Date: 1997/09/07 Message-ID: <34125E7A.7B25178B@ix.netcom.com.NOSPAM>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 270432760 References: <5umdhb$3t8$1@newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de> <19970905220401.SAA25082@ladder01.news.aol.com> Organization: webmercs X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Sep 07 1:00:05 AM PDT 1997 Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art A beautiful picture...but it is not a valid chart. #1) Where are the values? You have both "file formats" and dates on the Y axis, and no values on the X axis...now I will assume the X-axis is either total bits or number of images or "pages", but that still leaves us with the dual values on the y-axis. Also, if X is bits, your theory does not apply to the argument...for, IMHO, aside from the most important: total 'translatability', the practical reason for doing ascii-art is that the file-size is smaller than a gif or jpeg for the same sized picture. #2) I'd like to see the data that you used to form this chart. Where can I find it? Was there a survey, or did somebody find a way collect this type of data from all the servers on the internet? But, like I said, it is a pretty picture. PeteCasso wrote: > > Usage of art file formats on the Internet > ^ > | > | 1990's 2000's > | > | o o > | o o bell curve > | o o slides with time > | o o ----------------> > | o o > | o o > | o o > | o o > | o png? o > | o quicktime? o > | ascii gif shockwave? > |----------------------------------------------------------- > art file formats on the Internet > > What the chart is saying, is that gif is king of the hill in the 1990's, > there will be other kings of the hill in the next decade, etc. \/\/\/chainsaw buzz/\/\/\/\/ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ o _ |\ __ /t\|r\/ee\ o \t|rr|e/ o ------ Tom R. Earlywine @ @ c \__/ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ remove ".NOSPAM" from my address to reply! ______________________________________________________________________________________________ I'm getting tired of the word Papparazzi(sp?) being thrown about. These people are sick, moneygrabbing jerks with cameras that can't get an honest job and are giving a bad name to journalism, which, un-fortunately, is part of the phrase "bad journalism."