X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,5c9969e16e01fb49
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Sandy Morton <swm@atl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: ascii art for email and much more! (was: Copyright Notice,
 blah blah blah)
Date: 1997/09/08
Message-ID: <3413FEF4.4F2F@atl.hp.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 270864848
References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970904174642.13155A-100000@sacam.OREN.ORTN.EDU>
 <19970906163901.MAA07705@ladder01.news.aol.com>
Distribution: world
Organization: Hewlett-Packard
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art


Okay, I can resist no longer.  ;^)

PeteCasso wrote:
> ... just stating a position (my position) that is well
> established and perfectly non-controversial in creative circles.
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Pardon me, but exactly *where* are these circles?  The debate over
whether non-ascii art should be considered ascii art is so bizarre,
I can't fathom *where* your arguements would *not* be controversial.

Sandy