X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,ba9c41b344ffeea9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: l33812@alfa.ist.utl.pt (Seal do Mar) Subject: Re: My First Attempt! Date: 1997/09/19 Message-ID: <5vtsle$5lv$1@ci.ist.utl.pt>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 273907350 References: <341DBA6C.41C67EA6@nospam.sm.luth.se> <19970917234101.TAA03879@ladder02.news.aol.com> <34218CBA.523C@mpq.mpg.de> X-Complaints-To: news@news.ist.utl.pt X-Trace: ci.ist.utl.pt 874673646 5823 (None) 193.136.132.2 Organization: Instituto Superior Tecnico Reply-To: no@spam.com Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Andreas Freise (adf@mpq.mpg.de) wrote: > HomerXFile wrote: > > Much Better! Thank you > > ____ > > / \ > > I<> <>I I come in peace > > \ _ / > > \__/ / __ > > --II---/ __/ooooo\__ > > / II <___________> > > _II_ / I \ > Please switch to a non-proportional font (like eg arial?) > because otherwise we cannot see your Asciis. :( I might be mistaken but the Arial I know IS proportional Using Windows you have a greater chance to get a non-proportional font by choosing those that don't have the TT symbol behind it. My favorite one is the one you get when in a DOS Window you select the 5x12 (or is it 7x12?!) ... baaah, is the one where you can get a perfect slope using only '/' :) Other non-proportional fonts are plain simple Courier (not Courier New), System and a few more. -- .. ... .,----------------------------------,-. .. . I .. . .... .. . / Armando Frazao - aka Seal /--' .. ,'.`. ... .. .. / --*-- / .__,-'.:::.`-.__, .. . / l33812 @ alfa.ist.utl.pt / . .. ~-------------~ .. / http://alfa.ist.utl.pt/~l33812 / .. _|=|___|=|_ . (__________________________________(_; .__,-'.:::::::::.`-.__, .\/./ ~-------------------~ '\|/` "Mystery is the key to enchantment" _|_|_|___|_|_|_ _|_