X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,164a24230f084169 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: "Tom R. Earlywine" Subject: Re: [pic]smallest yin-yang ever Date: 1997/09/13 Message-ID: <341AEEC0.DABE3641@ix.netcom.com.NOSPAM>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 272211005 References: <19970913040101.AAA11444@ladder01.news.aol.com> <30e7fd1f.946793@news.abc.se> Organization: webmercs X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Sep 13 2:59:04 PM CDT 1997 Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art wowsers! IMO, both are absolute genius! Martin Rundqvist wrote: > > spunk1111@aol.com (Spunk1111) wrote: > > >-=[ tiny yin-yang ]=- 9/97 > > __ > > /.)\ > > jgs \(./ > > > >Has anyone done this yet?? It's only 10 characters-- three lines... > >If so, I'll take my initials off... > (%) > > 3 characters, 1 line !! > > ;) > > //Martin (Remove nospam. in reply adress in reply) -- ______________________________________________________________________________________________ o _ |\ __ /t\|r\/ee\ o \t|rr|e/ o ------ Tom R. Earlywine @ @ c \__/ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ remove ".NOSPAM" from my address to reply! ______________________________________________________________________________________________ I have to wonder if the reason why the media keeps throwing the word "Papparazzi"(sp?) about is that they are trying to separate themselves from these sick-o's...even though their constant use of this tragedy to sell advertising space is exactly the same thing as what caused it in the first place. STOP THE MADNESS-DON'T BUY THAT CRAP AND GET OVER YOUR FAME ADDICTION!