X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,cb9b84db809e750 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Tom Harvey Subject: Re: Illusions and impossible things :) Date: 1997/10/26 Message-ID: <967S1EAGZ3U0Ewd+@tomh.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 285111288 Distribution: world X-NNTP-Posting-Host: tomh.demon.co.uk [158.152.125.57] References: <344EAAA3.41C6@comports.com> <6bJDdEANemU0Ewui@tomh.demon.co.uk> <34529600.ABD322C@on.spammer> <34533ADD.794BDF32@on.spammer> Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art In article <34533ADD.794BDF32@on.spammer>, Veronica Karlsson writes >Tom Harvey wrote: >> >> In article <34529600.ABD322C@on.spammer>, Veronica Karlsson >> writes >> > >> >> Is that a clearer explanation? ;-) >> > >> >I understand what you are trying to say but I claim you are wrong. The >> >picture of the three blocks is quite possible. >> > >> >> I think we are going to have to agree to disagree on this one :-( >> I still think that it is not possible. I think that the over >> simplification that the ascii rendition has forced on it has made it >> ambiguous. >> >> I sat and stared at your lengthy explanation last night and thought, >> 'yes it is possible... no it isn't... yes it is... no it isn't...' >> >> I suppose that is what illusion is all about :-) > >I went out and bought myself some cubes (well, almost cubes) and _built_ >this mysterious object. Then I took these pictures of them from five >different angles: > >http://jota.sm.luth.se/~e93-vkn/pics/ascii/cube1.gif >http://jota.sm.luth.se/~e93-vkn/pics/ascii/cube2.gif >http://jota.sm.luth.se/~e93-vkn/pics/ascii/cube3.gif >http://jota.sm.luth.se/~e93-vkn/pics/ascii/cube4.gif >http://jota.sm.luth.se/~e93-vkn/pics/ascii/cube5.gif > >enjoy! :) > Wow! You went to these lengths just to prove me wrong?? I am flatered ;-) -- Tom Harvey | Newsgroup correspondence should be kept to newsgroups. tom@tomh. | Personal correspondence: UCE spoiler in use. demon.co.uk | For further details: http://www.nospam.demon.co.uk