X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,2f854fa8fe245ac5
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: mcreary@oz.net (Anne Mcreary)
Subject: small bunny
Date: 1997/11/22
Message-ID: <70324af8@oz.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 291539937
X-REPLY: 1:138/323.999 81a9881d
X-MSGID: 1:138/323 34763a47
Reply-To: mcreary@oz.net (Anne Mcreary)
X-MailConverter: Soup2pkt 2.22 (PRO)
To: All
X-TID: FastEcho 1.46.1 8692
Organization: Point and Counter Point BBS
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art


flump@quadrant.xs4all.nl (Hayley Jane Wakenshaw) wrote:

@X-NO-ARCHIVE: YES


 >> .   .  *  .  .         Merry Christmas!            .  _==_ .  .
 >> .   i/.\i .                                     .    (",)   .
 >> . i/o'.\i  .              ^aNT                  . ;-(: )-'  .
 >> .  i/.'.o.\i.        <ant@ns.vpszk.bme.hu>       .   ( :  ) .
 >> ^^^H^^^                                          `-..-'

 HW> Now it's a mongrel - a cross between mine and jgs's.

Sorry, my offline reader just made it look a whole lot worse :(  Wish I 
could
get it to stop that! <G><   But to the point of this message.  You have 
every
right to be upset when someone uses YOUR picture as one of their own.  
I've
been known to use many of the pictures here.  Even change them a bit like
adding a quotation or cutting and pasting parts.  BUT ...

I always give credit to the original artist.  It is only right!

 HW> What do others think? Am I being pathetic, or do other ppl feel
 HW> hard done by when they see ppl using their own work and suggesting,
 HW> by the omission of initials that it's by the person who "snatched"
 HW> it?

You are NOT being pathetic.  You are being protective of YOUR copyright! 
<G><


--
Take Care!

Anne McReary!
mcreary@oz.net
http://www.oz.net/~mcreary