X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,b217f9de36ff9682
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: jorn@mcs.com (Jorn Barger)
Subject: Re: Time for a new FAQ? [ plus a tiny fraction of my ascii
 collection...  ;) ]
Date: 1997/11/03
Message-ID: <1997110323045311157950N@jorn.pr.mcs.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 286927272
References: <345C0907.165F@spamfree.land> <345C4E45.794BDF32@on.spammer>
 <eMcDs8858GA.283@upnetnews03> <19971104043900.XAA01303@ladder02.news.aol.com>
X-Face: #0%K`N$`(&&tLbyv~^Ip59&CqKAo;?NXix@bv2a,uQX;y*zAek26=&iDOJou,
 2<IZTq?NUI'[KE$^WzGnT"NAGbe_TN=N)?nG3%af}D(A^2umq3L`R57#i5y_2ZoM]wq_
 4o0(U_p!-iT!`I;Z>\2pLI"TKqjx.[BfZf#2<k\ypW"&(^^K25G!^"zlm?
Organization: Spiral Solutions
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art


Spunk1111 <spunk1111@aol.com> wrote:
> Is sig length really an issue on mailing lists and other USENET
> newsgroups?  I get email from lots of people-- and many have
> sigs over the 5-6 lines...
>   I know Sven would argue the strict 4 line max for sig...
> I am curious...  I truly think that sig length concern is
> fading on the internet...


My principle is don't include the sig with every post.  If you only post
it once a month to a given group, it can be any old size; if you post it
twice a day, even two lines can get real old real fast.