X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,4a2333bede810652
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Sandy Morton <swm@atl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: Test
Date: 1997/05/28
Message-ID: <338C876F.7211@atl.hp.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 244561414
Distribution: world
References: <5m3pjv$o6t$1@fbi-news.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
 <338B547E.6CF3@centraltx.net> <338C2DE5.41DF@atl.hp.com>
 <5mhp3v$pup@cronkite.ocis.temple.edu>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art


Joann Russo wrote:

> Sandy Morton (swm@atl.hp.com) wrote:
  [ ... snip of post, followed up by re-attached credits ... ]
> : Sandy (defender of credits)

> chill, please.

I'm sorry.  Maybe I am missing something.  But, why would you have
a problem with re-attaching credits to a picture that was posted
with the credits missing?  I actually thought I was doing it rather
politely.

Please elaborate on what it was that led you to believe "chilling"
was needed.

Thank you.

Sandy (who *likes* to defend the credits on ascii-art)