X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,c7fff97f76085e56 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: lennert@demon.nl (Lennert Stock) Subject: Re: Ascii-artists Date: 1997/03/08 Message-ID: <332d7b9d.80495895@news.demon.nl>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 223976712 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pc-17.demon.nl References: <19970308070300.CAA02918@ladder01.news.aol.com> Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art On 8 Mar 1997 07:03:31 GMT, spunk1111@aol.com wrote: >In article , guckes@banach.math.fu-berlin.de (Sven Guckes) writes: >>Can I play, too? OK: What makes an artist? > >Checked my Random House dictionary... I think there's a valid point. There's a fine difference - there are posts were a very simple ascii picture is included and the author calls him/herself an artist.. that makes me go hmmm.. But don't listen to me. I think that 99% of people calling themselves artists are fakes who make up fine reasons of superiority to explain their noise (nuffing wrong about that) where it's just about fun (nuffing wrong about that either). -- Lennert Stock http://www.lstock.demon.nl/ lstock@lstock.demon.nl