X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,c7fff97f76085e56
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: guckes@banach.math.fu-berlin.de (Sven Guckes)
Subject: Re: Ascii-artists
Date: 1997/03/10
Message-ID: <slrn5i86r8.29f.guckes@banach.math.fu-berlin.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 224397813
References: <slrn5i0s04.s83.guckes@banach.math.fu-berlin.de>
 <19970308070300.CAA02918@ladder01.news.aol.com>
 <33214348.41C67EA6@sm.luth.se.nospam> <332369D1.1661@cybersol.com>
X-Newsreader-Info: http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/slrn/
Organization: Freie Universitaet Berlin
X-Access: 16 17 19
Reply-To: guckes@math.fu-berlin.de
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art


ProfZone@cybersol.com (Professor):
> Having been a professional artist/designer for over 30 years, I view "artists"
> as 1) learning, 2) competant, 3) accomplished, and 4) vulgar copycats.

I think you missspellt "yearning", "competing",
"accompliced", and "very vulgar copycats".  ;-)

> I would rather view the simple renderings of a new "artist" than the
> plagiarized, reworked offerings of copycats, no matter how talented they may
> be at their craft.

I like wonders, too.  :-)

Sven

-- 
Post in ASCII
Read in ASCII
Live in ASCII