X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,da625742bd70d801 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Veronica Karlsson Subject: Re: Help me with my apple! Date: 1997/07/02 Message-ID: <33BA337D.167EB0E7@nospam.sm.luth.se>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 254109082 References: <9706302307.23cx@darkside.demon.co.uk> Organization: Junk e-mail gladly reported (I have got credit for chucking several spammers out of their accounts) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Edward Farrow wrote: > > In a message of 19 Jun 97 Veronica Karlsson wrote to All: > > VK> What in this apple is not "standard ascii"? > VK> ,~_~,._ > VK> /'`'`' > VK> ,d88b.d88b, > VK> 88888888888 > VK> d888888888b > VK> `d8888888b' > VK> `d8^8b' > VK> Lets see if I can find what you are referring to > > Nice apple btw. > > VK> Ascii table: > VK> | 0 NUL| 1 SOH| 2 STX| 3 ETX| 4 EOT| 5 ENQ| 6 ACK| 7 BEL| > VK> | 8 BS | 9 HT | 10 NL | 11 VT | 12 NP | 13 CR | 14 SO | 15 SI | > VK> | 16 DLE| 17 DC1| 18 DC2| 19 DC3| 20 DC4| 21 NAK| 22 SYN| 23 ETB| > VK> | 24 CAN| 25 EM | 26 SUB| 27 ESC| 28 FS | 29 GS | 30 RS | 31 US | > VK> | 32 SP | 33 ! | 34 " | 35 # | 36 $ | 37 % | 38 & | 39 ' | > VK> | 40 ( | 41 ) | 42 * | 43 + | 44 , | 45 - | 46 . | 47 / | > VK> | 48 0 | 49 1 | 50 2 | 51 3 | 52 4 | 53 5 | 54 6 | 55 7 | > VK> | 56 8 | 57 9 | 58 : | 59 ; | 60 < | 61 = | 62 > | 63 ? | > VK> | 64 @ | 65 A | 66 B | 67 C | 68 D | 69 E | 70 F | 71 G | > VK> | 72 H | 73 I | 74 J | 75 K | 76 L | 77 M | 78 N | 79 O | > VK> | 80 P | 81 Q | 82 R | 83 S | 84 T | 85 U | 86 V | 87 W | > VK> | 88 X | 89 Y | 90 Z | 91 [ | 92 \ | 93 ] | 94 ^ | 95 _ | > VK> | 96 ` | 97 a | 98 b | 99 c |100 d |101 e |102 f |103 g | > VK> |104 h |105 i |106 j |107 k |108 l |109 m |110 n |111 o | > VK> |112 p |113 q |114 r |115 s |116 t |117 u |118 v |119 w | > VK> |120 x |121 y |122 z |123 { |124 | |125 } |126 ~ |127 DEL| > > You're missing 128-255 I have some of them on a table, do you want it? I think that the person who accused the maker of that apple to use non-standard ascii meant that the picture contained characters in that range, which I claim that it doesn't. The range 128-255 has different definitions and interpretations on different computers (even in different programs in the same computer) and I have got the impression that they are considered unsuitable for ascii pictures. Your table would probably come up as ape shit on my screen, in any case not as what you intended, but please post it and I will show you a screen shot of what shows up when I try to watch it... (if you use a PC with Windows 3.x or Win95 you can make a similar picture using this program: http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/progs/grab ) -- :) Veronica Karlsson ( e93-vkn@sm.luth.se http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ) ( llizard's fanclub: http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/llpages )