X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,142360b94f2556b2,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Veronica Karlsson Subject: Re: LOOK WHAT I FOUND!!! Date: 1997/07/10 Message-ID: <33C4C0BF.446B9B3D@nospam.sm.luth.se>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 255935514 Organization: Junk e-mail gladly reported (I have got credit for chucking several spammers out of their accounts) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art PeteCasso wrote: > >How do you tell the difference? > > Well, the stomach bump is higher up in the torso than the womb bump, i.e. > each bump is closer to the associated body opening, that's how I tell the > difference without ultrasound equipment. (Anatomically speaking, there are > two body openings associated with the stomach, but I am always looking at > things from the positive side, as you well know by now.) > Ok, that one makes sense :D > > (can llizards be pregnant? > > Well, just in case they don't have belly buttons, they must have some > place in the body to develop their eggs which are big relative to their > body size, leading to pregnancy bumps in the torso one way or another. > Really? [[Come on all you people who knew so much about snakes, help me with this one!]] > > If the > >llizard is pregnant, why is there no bump in the first picture?) > > Well, one possible explanation is that llizard got a partner after eating > Frogstein and was feeling good with a boosted ego. While I am writing > these lines, I wonder whether Frogstein can be eaten as an aphrodisiac for > human beings as well. Of course it needs to be prepared in a better way > than the FrenchBurgersteins. > Sorry, but this one does not make sense. If the llizard is that much pregnant there should have been a bump in the first picture, alternatively if the llizard had eaten the frog first and got pregnant later there should not have been a pregnancy bump on the second picture. -- :) Veronica Karlsson ( e93-vkn@sm.luth.se http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ) ( llizard's fanclub: http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/llpages )