X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,a392393cffd7f4bf X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Veronica Karlsson Subject: Re: LOOK WHAT I FOUND!!! Date: 1997/07/13 Message-ID: <33C9318C.2781E494@nospam.sm.luth.se>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 256668271 References: <19970708215800.RAA15089@ladder02.news.aol.com> <19970712234601.TAA08936@ladder02.news.aol.com> Organization: Junk e-mail gladly reported (I have got credit for chucking several spammers out of their accounts) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art PeteCasso wrote: > > >Sorry, but this one does not make sense. If the llizard is that much > >pregnant there should have been a bump in the first picture, > >alternatively if the llizard had eaten the frog first and got pregnant > >later there should not have been a pregnancy bump on the second picture. > > Well, one possible explanation is that the gestation period is shorter > than the intervals between meals. Interesting theory (but why don't I believe in it?) :D -- :) Veronica Karlsson ( e93-vkn@sm.luth.se http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ) ( llizard's fanclub: http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/llpages )