X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9e15,2e31840ad04ba69
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e15,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,9591383f6dfbb711
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: f9c1f,2e31840ad04ba69
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9c1f,public
From: Christopher Drayson <cdrayson@glenlake.sprl.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: moose-ascii  -small-
Date: 1997/02/07
Message-ID: <5dem89$96@sun.sirius.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 215037573
distribution: world
references: <32F61307.7984@exeter.oxford.ac.uk>
 <Pine.GSO.3.95-960729.970206143527.8189D-100000@altair.dur.ac.uk>
 <ik3EjDAiyY+yEwHN@flag.demon.co.uk>
content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
x-xxmessage-id: <AF201D262502E330@ppp048-sf1.sirius.com>
organization: Sirius Connections
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.moose.rights,alt.smoking.mooses


In article
<Pine.GSO.3.95-960729.970206143527.8189D-100000@altair.dur.ac.uk> Zebedee
[Boing!], J.P.M.Roberts@durham.ac.uk writes:
>On Tue, 4 Feb 1997, Hannah Werdmuller wrote:
>%Damian Baker writes
>%>Fantasitic meese!!!!!
>%THE PLURAL OF MOOSE IS MEESE!!!!!
>OOoooh I love those meeses to pieces (or is that mOOses to peeses?)

No, I think it is mOOses to pOOses.

Maybe that's not such a good idea, though.

Chris Drayson        
San Francisco, CA             cdrayson@glenlake.sprl.umich.edu