X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,4a3b047f59ec12f3 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: lindsay@sol.co.uknoUCEwanted (Lindsay) Subject: Re: Interim Results Date: 1997/02/20 Message-ID: <330bcc73.344849949@news.sol.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 220053800 References: <554513991wnr@nbarker.demon.co.uk> <33164c37.246471001@news.sol.co.uk> <856387870snz@mcgwin.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Me, Myself, I Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: lindsay@sol.co.uknoUCEwanted Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art On Wed, 19 Feb 97 21:31:10 GMT, John@mcgwin.demon.co.uk (John McGinlay) summoned up the energy to type: >In article > dam@kerrera.dcs.gla.ac.uk "The Nit Nurse" > claims to have won a local sig contest with > these pathetic attempts: [*Posted to alt.ascii-art only*] I would urge the good people of a.a-a to steer well clear of this article. What is going on at present in one of the groups in the x-post is a flamewar regards the length a sig should be. It is *NOT* a sig contest and never has been a contest. The poster has x-posted this to a number of groups in an attempt to add further fuel to a long-running flamewar where some net policemen in an insignificant demon.* group insist in no uncertain terms that a sig will be 4 lines or less *or else*. You have been warned. Ignore this, and follow-ups like the plague. A friend. LINZ