X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fd588,6e2d4c8b8aa9dead
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd588,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,6e2d4c8b8aa9dead
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Hercules Gunter <hgunter@wantree.com.au>
Subject: Re: Windows 95 Pain Reliever
Date: 1997/02/05
Message-ID: <32F963AF.4170@wantree.com.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 214606881
references: <5c816t$24@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net>
  <32F2E9F9.5E82@citizen.infi.net> <5d49r6$mij@infoserv.rug.ac.be>
 <RhBYCGA2Ad9yEwId@flag.demon.co.uk> <32F62AC8.42AE@x-wing.org>
 <slrn5fd8n8.1f1.morpheus@destiny.calweb.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Wantree Development
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.ascii-art.animation
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I)


Steve Lamb wrote:
. 
. On Mon, 03 Feb 1997 13:13:28 -0500, Luke Skywalker <luke@x-wing.org>
wrote:
. >That's a nice idea, but 95 is the minimum IQ you need to handle win95
. 
.     How many times we gotta tell you.  It is the maximum IQ... 
Maximum, not
. minimum.  :)
. 
.                                  Steve C. Lamb

Can't be - if that were so, it would be easy to use!  Maybe it was the
average IQ of the people who wrote it?