X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,f1699d30bb8405c6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: David Riley Subject: Re: Chess (was: Mancala board) Date: 1997/12/18 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 299249009 References: <66svp7$ns6$1@news01.micron.net> <34968FC7.7A3F@freent.toronto.on.ca> <3497F87B.1F3A@freent.toronto.on.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Distribution: world X-NNTP-Posting-Host: dmriley.demon.co.uk [194.222.183.234] Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art In article <3497F87B.1F3A@freent.toronto.on.ca>, llizard writes >In article , David Riley > wrote: >> + >> () >> )( >> __)(_ >> /\/__\\ >> ____()/ \____[] >> \ )( /`\ )( >> \__)(\/___\__)(\ >> \/__\\ \/XX\\ >> \____\____\____\ >> > >I like the board (even if I don't quite understand it). But it doesn't >seem like a very dangerous position for White. Couldn't White just take >the black rook and that would be the end of it? It's just supposed to be an illusion - the two white pieces are both on the same level as the black rook, but not on the same level as each other (the queen is higher). -- { { wwWWww } } David Riley dave@dmriley.demon.co.uk { {(.)(.)} } http://www.dmriley.demon.co.uk { { | } } { { =} } "There is nothing incomprehensible." - Lautreamont