X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,7fd2e0d76ccb787d X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: "Jonathon R. Oglesbee" Subject: Re: Crab. Date: 1997/08/23 Message-ID: <01bcaf70$190e5960$d2f89bce@default>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 268090463 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.155.248.210 References: <33F92010.B9229D21@ix.netcom.com> <19970822182001.OAA29494@ladder01.news.aol.com> <33FDE6AA.2CD0@ix.netcom.com.NOSPAM> <33FE0B08.1E00@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art You are wise. Tiny asciis are useless with a big set of initials in them. It's not like you were painting on a canvass, and could alter the size of the signature. I would use my full name, in all my pix, if it weren't so damn long. I would be a real microencephalatic, if I then went around whining about people taking off the name. Initials aren't bad, on a large pix, either incorporated into it, or alongside, but even they are too intrusive, on many two or three liners. That's too bad, perhaps, but that's also just the way it is. ---- Unless someone can come up with a way of putting on a dinky dinky little name, that otherwise doesn't spoil the pix.