X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,caeb065726bb6bf8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: cq547@freent.toronto.on.ca (llizard) Subject: Re: Joan's Animated Pixie (Hold spacebar down) Date: 1997/04/23 Message-ID: <335E1D34.398B@freent.toronto.on.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 236827951 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: lagoon.idirect.com References: <335CD2EE.41C67EA6@sm.luth.se.nospam> X-Newsmaster: Laszlo Herczeg (las@idirect.com) Organization: via Internetdirect, Canada; zone 5 (or is it 6A?) X-Client-Port: 1869 Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Veronica Karlsson wrote: > > llizard wrote: > > Well, rats! That is the second spacebar animation that didn't work for > > me. What a great idea though. When I hold the space bar down, the thing > > goes way too fast. Maybe if the picture being animated was smaller it > > would work? Too bad. It seemed like a good alternative to those Java > > things some of us have done and few are able to see. [snip] > I think it would probably work if the picture was BIGGER..... (and > probably the best size would be very different for different > computers...) > > When I tried holding the space-bar down I accidentally flew too far and > marked a large number of unread messaged read and had some trouble > finding my way back... [snip] > > I think the new java method is the best so far (of the ones that I have > seen) and I also think that in a couple of years java will become more > common. > > I think our greatest problem here is still compatibility between > different types of computers. > Veronica Karlsson > ( e93-vkn@sm.luth.se http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ) > ( llizard's animation site: http://jota.sm.luth.se:80/~e93-vkn/docs/ ) Big or small, the space bar animations just don't work for me. A fellow sent me an altered version of the small one I had tried, altered by adding a whole lot of frames. I gather that it worked for him. But all that happened here was that a whole lot of frames whooshed by and sent me to the next e-mail in the in-box. So I have to agree that the Java scripted ones work the best by far. You're right. It's a shame that Mac/IBM/Microsoft Explorer are so busy competing and insulting each other that they can't see the merits of making themselves compatible with each other. NOTE: If you hit the reply button, add an "e" to the "freent"; its absense is to stop the torment of automatic mailers. -- ___ ha Here I am _/ | ,^%--- ha working on getting my |_____| __ > \ha OWN homepage to take up band width --- == -- > [_____] __>,^ llizard aka ejm | | //| | cq547@freenet.toronto.on.ca