X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,ff809d8e9ad23dba
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: fefc7,6a4465655d317cde
X-Google-Attributes: gidfefc7,public
From: meta@pobox.com (mathew)
Subject: Re: What's the smallest screen you design for?
Date: 1996/10/29
Message-ID: <5556b8$euf@rocannon.cam.harlequin.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 192930584
references: <3267E6A6.29C5@interlog.com> <54ftl2$pll@Venus.mcs.net>
 <Pine.A32.3.95.961024112148.134356A-100000@homer22.u.washington.edu>
 <DztB6o.C78@news2.new-york.net>
followup-to: alt.ascii-art
organization: Harlington-Straker
newsgroups: comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html,alt.ascii-art
originator: meta@snotra


In article <DztB6o.C78@news2.new-york.net>, Abigail <abigail@ny.fnx.com> wrote:
>
>  --((8:>*  moussie!

   }<(([@>   fish!

   _@/       snail!


mathew
-- 
meta@pobox.com        content available at <URL:http://www.pobox.com/%7Emeta/>
 Help prevent bias on the net; see <URL:http://www.pobox.com/%7Emeta/rs/ot/>
    "There's safety in numbers... Large prime numbers." -- John Gilmore