X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,ff809d8e9ad23dba,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: fefc7,6a4465655d317cde X-Google-Attributes: gidfefc7,public From: jorn@MCS.COM (Jorn Barger) Subject: Re: What's the smallest screen you design for? Date: 1996/10/21 Message-ID: <54ftl2$pll@Venus.mcs.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 190973032 references: <3267E6A6.29C5@interlog.com> organization: The Responsible Party newsgroups: comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html,alt.ascii-art [ xposted to alt.ascii-art because of the WebTV-screen-width question ] [ xposted from comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html, so observe proper decorum (heh!) ;^] In article <3267E6A6.29C5@interlog.com>, Lorne Tontegode wrote: >I have seen discussion in the past regarding not designing for a >specific resolution but rather design for all resolutions. >But, how low do you go? Do most designers go all the way down to an old >Mac screen of say 300 or so pixels wide or do you not go lower than 640 >pixels? I'm baffled why no one in this thread has brought up WebTV, and the other browsers that use NTSC video for the display (640*480, more or less, I think). Apparently the first versions have hit the stores, and use anti-aliased text, so are quite readable. But the screen shot I examined in an ad looked like about 13 rows of 65-char-wide *proportional* text-- so
text probably ought to be wrapped at 50 chars or so, I'm guessing.

I don't understand, either, why none of the previews of WebTV offer an
exact number for readable-monospaced-screen-width...?

I use PRE a lot, including clickable ascii imagemaps, so will probably
redesign my screens to work semi-decently for WebTV apps.  But what's
the dang number, already???

In general, the only reasonable philosophy seems to me twofold:

1- design your site in minimal HTML that will work fine in Lynx or other
   non-graphic browsers

2- finetune it with bells-n-whistles that will maximize its appeal for
   your intended audience.  last year, this just meant Netscapize it,
   but in the future it may even require multiple versions with b's-n-w's
   finetuned for: Netscape, Explorer, WebTV, ...and AT&T's inevitable
   touchtone browser!  ;^/


I've been distracted from this group for some time, but traffic to my
hypertext-theory pages has been growing anyway:
.  If you haven't visited
these, please give them a look.  There's a timeline of hypertext
history that gives a very broad perspective, a checklist of common
design errors that's completely different from the usual ciwah lists,
detailed rants about various sites' designs, and some abstract
explorations of cognitive science and hypertext design.



j

-==---
... i loved you, so i drew these tides of men into my hands...  _+m"m+_"+_
             lynx http://www.mcs.net/~jorn/ !             Jp   Jp     qh qh
          best-of news:alt.music.category-freak !         O    O       O  O
           ftp://ftp.mcs.com/mcsnet.users/jorn/           Yb   Yb     dY dY
...and wrote my will across the sky in stars.  --R.Graves  "Y_  "Y5m2Y"  "