X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,75fc6bfbd79b74a4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: nick@tindrum.tng.oche.de (David Hendrix) Subject: Re: Proportional ASCII art (?) Date: 1996/10/08 Message-ID: <6IVx1gAbocB@p0000069.tindrum.oche.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 188056066 distribution: world references: <32518178.5670196@news.telepac.pt> content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 organization: Rage Machine Mainsystem x-gateway: ZCONNECT UU tindrum.tng.oche.de [DUUCP vom 01.07.1994] mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: alt.ascii-art x-mailer: CrossPoint v3.11 R/A12763 via [DOS/NCBMail V2.30 REL.:010996] |"| When I scanned my Messagebase on 08.10.96 I o,*,(o o) found this Message from pmeg on topic 8(o o)(_)Ooo Proportional ASCII art (?) (date: 02.10.96). ooO-(_)---Ooo------------------------------------------------------------- PG> Is there such a thing as proportional ASCII art? Well someone from AOL postet some ASCII using proportional fonts, but I don't like this. Everyone using proportional fonts can use fixed fonts too but many people only have fixed fonts. In addition art using proportional fonts depends on which font to use (and which you might not have) and which side to view at. PG> All ascii art I've seen is in a fixed pitch font. What I see as the better way. PG> I don't think I can do more than a box in ascii art, PG> (fixed pitch or proportional) but proportional fonts PG> have a structure that can (can it?) be used to make PG> different (interesting?) pictures. Maybe, but what's about all the people who can't use proportional fonts and don't have the font you used? __.oOo.__ v-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ /'( _ )`\ W -=*> David Hendrix <*=- X / . \/^\/ . \ I Nick@TinDrum.tng.oche.de H / _)_`-'_(_ \ N PGP-Key available T /.-~ ).( ~-.\ '-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-! /' /\_/\ `\ 9 Wish you'll have some Fun.... o -=-=-=-"-V-"-=-=-=-=-=-=5 |\| | [ |< N +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-^ A relationship is a terrible thing to waste