X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,2d793f7f11fbd8fb X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: cyng@lamere.net (Pith Him) Subject: Re: On "borrowing" other pple's sigs Date: 1996/08/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 172442767 references: <4nsq19$o1u@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <4o8ftk$der@news.acns.nwu.edu> <4ocomq$fem@orm.southern.co.nz> organization: Agate Internet Services (AIS) newsgroups: alt.ascii-art In article <4ocomq$fem@orm.southern.co.nz>, cfbd@southern.co.nz (Colin Douthwaite) wrote: > Daniel Au (dcau@casbah.acns.nwu.edu) wrote: > > >Especially in this newsgroup, since our sigs tend to be more elaborate than > >those on other newsgroups, many of the artists would prefer that other people > >not use their sigs without permission, and then with some changes. This > >rational stems from the belief that our "sigs" should be like our signatures > >in real life - that there should be no two that are alike. > > Now you know why I use my Sig ( below )...nobody thinks it is worth > using ! > > Hmm...perhaps I should figletize it ? :-) :-) > > Bye, <==== my sig :-) Yyyyyyyep. Yer sig isn't necessarily an opus or lifetime's achievement, but if you drew it, you own it, publicly declared or not. The copyright laws of the US declare any written work the property of the writer (That doesn't include "I used the word "anal" in a book, and so you can't," of course), and the same extends to other artistic mediums. And a sig is just that. Bleh, I babble. Hope you folks like my sig. (: o -=Thomas J. Boyer=- o | -=www - http://sanctum.ocala.com/~cyng/home.html=- | O>///////<|>=========================----=========================<|>\\\\\\\=- | o -=Tsaim Kurros=- o . . . . . . . . . d u m v i v i m u s , v i v a m u s ! . . . . . . . . .