X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,8e698528c8ebbc52
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: guckes@euler.math.fu-berlin.de (Sven Guckes)
Subject: Re: Which signature should I use?
Date: 1996/08/07
Message-ID: <slrn50h3k7.682.guckes@euler.math.fu-berlin.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 172675215
references: <3207bc9e.12758747@news> <3207CD09.5F8E@thetemple.com>
 <32081e50.18405092@news>
organization: Freie Universitaet Berlin
x-access: 16 17 19
reply-to: guckes@math.fu-berlin.de
newsgroups: alt.ascii-art


rjenn@ns.net (Robert Jennings):
> Here's a few others I made tonight.  There good, and
> I like them, but Sven would say they're too bigggggggg.
>           _________________________
>          / _______________________ \     Robert R Jennings          
>         / / __  __  __  __  __  __\ \__  __  __  __  __  __  __  
>         \ \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/   \ \ \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \
>          \__/\__/\__/\__/\__/\__/\__\ \__/\__/\__/\__/\__/\__/\ \ 
>                                      \ \______________________/ /
>                E-Mail:rjenn@ns.net    \________________________/   

Yup, "too big for sig".  And no sigs without sigdashes, either.
Apart from that they make nice pictures in posts.
Btw, your snake is about to eat itself!  ;-)

Sven