X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,a9edb6fc551e8985
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Micah D Vono <vonom@freenet.msp.mn.us>
Subject: Re: biniary vs. in message
Date: 1996/04/23
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91r.960423201938.22045C-100000@freenet>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 151079270
references: <317bf124.370848262@206.74.59.105>
x-sender: vonom@freenet
content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
organization: gofast.net -- ISDN ISP for MPLS/STPL
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: alt.ascii-art

On Mon, 22 Apr 1996, Magnus wrote:

> I'm seeing alot of good ascii art being posted.. but my copy of Agent
> screws some of them up... wouldn't it be better to post large ascii
> art messages as biniary attatchments?
> 
> 
	YES YES YES YES YES!! KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE ARE STILL SOME OF 
US WHO CANNOT DECODE THAT STUFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ATTACHMENTS!!!!


      ____________
======\         //================Micah AKA Gambit==============
=======\       //=============vonom@freenet.msp.mn.us===========
========\     //======http://www.wavefront.com/~vono/planetv====
=========\   //=================================================
           \/