X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,44e4ac927ec36340 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-24 14:56:01 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!EU.net!uunet!comp.vuw.ac.nz!canterbury.ac.nz!southern.co.nz!equinox.gen.nz!equinox!not-for-mail From: Colin_Douthwaite@equinox.gen.nz (Colin Douthwaite) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Talk: Crossposting with rec.arts.ascii Date: 24 Nov 1994 21:02:08 GMT Organization: Southern InterNet Services Lines: 82 Message-ID: <3b2v0g$lp7@southern.co.nz> References: <3am49f$gtc@sashimi.wwa.com> <3arpk6$pps@southern.co.nz> <3at3it$hhl@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: equinox.gen.nz X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 941121BETA PL0] Bob Allison (boba@wwa.com) wrote: > I cannot speak for other moderators. Some are dictators I'm > sure, but I'm not one of them. Nobody has anything to fear from > posting or cross-posting to r.a.a. My comments were not aimed at the r.a.a. moderator or indeed any other specific moderator but at the protocols followed when a moderated newsgroup appears in a newsgroup listing. The posting goes first to the moderated group and later is released to the unmoderated groups. ( Thinking about it I wonder why it's done like that - it is a form of control on the unmoderated groups - or did I miss something somewhere ? ). I am uncertain what happens if a moderator rejects a posting for actual inclusion in the moderated group - presumably it is the moderator's decision whether to forward it to the unmoderated groups. If it is a silly or offensive posting perhaps it goes no further. Many users _do not know_ what actually happens to their posting if a moderated newsgroup is included in the newsgroup line. I certainly didn't know until Jorn Barger explained it in a posting shortly after r.a.a was created in May/June. When sending a follow-up to an existing posting it is not readily apparent that the existing newsgroup line contains moderated newsgroups ( unless of course you are already aware of the status of all the listed groups ). I respond to many postings without realising what the status of each newsgroup listed actually is. Until very recently my access site did not carry r.a.a ( and many other groups ) and it was simply impossible to post from here to that newsgroup. A message would appear saying " the newsgroup r.a.a is not a valid newsgroup at this site". As I pointed out in my original posting users who post their messages _non-interactively_ might not even see such a warning and then be puzzled why their postings did not appear in the newsgroup(s). Their message will never reach any of the "invalid" newsgroups - moderated or not. I will still be interested to learn what happens to a posting that has _more than one_ moderated newsgroup included in its newsgroups line list - presumably it could get stuck anywhere along the line. Quite a tricky place this Net :-) Oh yes - a picture: ____________________ | ________________ | | | | | | | ALL Newsgroups | | | | are invalid | | | | at this Site | | | | :-) | | | |________________| | |____________________| ///// ______|_ / ////// ******* \ / (//////) ******* \ : .. ... . . ..--- ////// ------ ())*(() .. . ... _____|____|_____ (*()(())) / \ (((((*(() | |()(()(())_ | |(((()(*() | \ '\()*)))( | \ \((((( / \ . \___. ( \ / \ |:| ) \ | | |`------' | \____________/ \_________/ ......................................................... Bye,