X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11b058,ebb21b873f5f09aa
X-Google-Attributes: gid11b058,public
X-Google-Thread: 109a19,ebb21b873f5f09aa
X-Google-Attributes: gid109a19,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,ebb21b873f5f09aa
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: 12856a,ebb21b873f5f09aa
X-Google-Attributes: gid12856a,public
X-Google-Thread: 10be17,ebb21b873f5f09aa
X-Google-Attributes: gid10be17,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-23 03:57:14 PST
Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news.cac.psu.edu!ppp34.cac.psu.edu!pda1
From: pda1@bwtch.com (C.J.Parker)
Newsgroups: 
 alt.binaries.pictures.erotica,alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities,alt.mag.playboy,alt.binaries.pictures.supermodels
Subject: Re: REQUEST: PAMELA ANDERSON
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 04:38:13 GMT
Organization: CAC
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <pda1.1221.2ED2C734@bwtch.com>
References: <dclinder-1311941848180001@pme02.pomo.wis.net>
 <rps8.1168.2EC6DD36@psu.edu> <5a49dCbY-QB@p0000020.tindrum.oche.de>
 <3atlap$sns@auntie.bbcnc.org.uk> <pda1.1219.2ED2C479@bwtch.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp34.cac.psu.edu
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4]

In article <pda1.1219.2ED2C479@bwtch.com> pda1@bwtch.com (C.J.Parker) writes:
>From: pda1@bwtch.com (C.J.Parker)
>Subject: Re: REQUEST: PAMELA ANDERSON
>Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 04:26:33 GMT

>In article <3atlap$sns@auntie.bbcnc.org.uk> j.galley@bbcnc.org.uk (John Galley)
>writes:
>>From: j.galley@bbcnc.org.uk (John Galley)
>>Subject: Re: REQUEST: PAMELA ANDERSON
>>Date: 22 Nov 1994 20:46:17 GMT

>>In article <5a49dCbY-QB@p0000020.tindrum.oche.de>, f.beer@tindrum.oche.de
>(FrankBeer) says:

>>>I post Pamela Anderson scans in /ALT/BINAERIES/FEMALE. Two at first, but the
>>>other 10 follow in the next days. The Pictures where scanned from the american
>>>and the German Playboy, because there different.
>>> 
>>>Mfg. Frank                               ( EMail: F.Beer@Tindrum.oche.de )
>>>
>>>## CrossPoint v3.02 ##

>Even considering that  /ALT/BINAERIES/FEMALE includes a typo, I don't think 
>the group exists.  Don't see why it should either.   I think a.b.p.supermodels 
>and a.b.p.erotica would cover just about every female considered.  And with 
>THIS group, is there even any need for a.b.p.female?

>C.J.

... then again, maybe a.b.p.female DOES exist in Denmark.  I wonder how that 
would relate to something being rotten there?  :)

C.J.