X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,34dd300224bbc68d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-05-17 05:00:24 PST
Path: 
 gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!psuvax1!psuvax1!flee
From: flee@cse.psu.edu (Felix Lee)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: DIS: rec vs alt (Please Read)
Date: 16 May 1994 21:06:32 GMT
Organization: Penn State Comp Sci & Eng
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <FLEE.94May16170633@dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu>
References: <Cpt3t5.1G1@brunel.ac.uk> <2r5tt5$poh@fido.asd.sgi.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu

Scott Nelson:
>it's a big win for rec.arts.ascii, but alt.ascii-art will suffer, consider;
>The quality of alt.ascii-art will drop by some amount as talent leaves
>to post in rec.arts.ascii (moderated.)  

Easy to fix.  Just make sure that everything posted to rec.arts.ascii
is also crossposted to alt.ascii-art.
--