X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,6fef76e7b764a2b1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-05-24 15:02:12 PST
Path: 
 gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!psuvax1!psuvax1!flee
From: flee@cse.psu.edu (Felix Lee)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: rec.arts.scarecrow ?
Date: 24 May 1994 18:22:39 GMT
Organization: Penn State Comp Sci & Eng
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <FLEE.94May24142240@dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu>
References: <134311Z21051994@anon.penet.fi>
 <FLEE.94May21200004@dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu>
	<FLEE.94May22153934@dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu>
	<2rt1at$nrr@news-feed-2.PeachNet.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu

Troy Fore:
>Those two groups are NOT going to get deleted,

Right.  At least, not anytime soon.  This is one of the reasons I
haven't changed my yes vote yet.

> This paranoia is ridiculous.

It's not paranoia; it's planning ahead.  The proponents of
rec.arts.ascii clearly did quite a bit of planning ahead, in writing
the charter, in laying groundwork for the RFD and CFV, in choosing to
make it moderated, and in choosing a moderator.  Such an effort
certainly deserves a matching effort on my part.  Anything less would
be disrespectful.  :)
--